Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022): Modelling knowledge, archival and bibliographic standards in comparison. 1st JLIS.it Seminar - 19 May 2022
Articles

Identifiers within conceptual models and standards

Italian PDF
  • Laura Manzoni
Laura Manzoni
University of Florence
Bio
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-473
Categories

Published 2022-09-15

Keywords

  • Identifiers,
  • Standard,
  • Conceptual Models,
  • Cataloguing Standards

How to Cite

Manzoni, Laura. 2022. “Identifiers Within Conceptual Models and Standards”. JLIS.It 13 (3):125-35. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-473.

Copyright (c) 2022 Laura Manzoni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Identifiers are numeric or alphanumeric strings of characters permanently and uniquely associated with a resource to ensure stable access to it and its metadata. They play a fundamental role in the semantic web as they guarantee interoperability between different systems. Since their emergence, libraries and other institutions have been aware of their importance in data quality control processes, for the realization of authority control and universal bibliographic control, and have dedicated specific chapters for their registration within conceptual models, cataloguing standards and have provided specific fields in cataloguing formats.

 

Italian PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Boulet, Vincent. 2022. “How to build an ‘Identifier’s policy’: the BnF use case”. JLIS.it 13(1): [177]-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12768.
  2. Commissione permanente per la revisione delle regole italiane, ed. 2009. Regole italiane di catalogazione REICAT. Roma: ICCU.
  3. Concedda, Flavia. 2015. “ISSN e I suoi fratelli: la lunga marcia dei codici internazionali: prima parte: UNESCO, ISO e il primogenito”. AIB Studi 55(2): 295-308.
  4. Concedda, Flavia. 2015. “ISSN e i suoi fratelli: la lunga marcia dei codici internazionali: parte seconda: il CNR e la storia italiana dell’ISSN. Gli altri sistemi identificativi”. AIB Studi 55(3): 439-457.
  5. Guerrini, Mauro. 2020. Dalla catalogazione alla metedatazione. Tracce di un percorso. Roma: Associazione italiana biblioteche.
  6. Guerrini, Mauro, Tiziana Possemato. 2015. Linked data per biblioteche, archivi e musei. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  7. Heih, Jackie and Terry Reese. 2015. “The importance of identifiers in the new web environment and using the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) in subfield zero ($0): a small step that is actually a big step”. Journal of Library Metadata 15(3-4): 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099981
  8. IFLA (International Federation of Library Association and Institutions). (2010). Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD). A conceptual model. Edited by Marcia Lei Zeng, Maja Žumer, Athena Salaba. Berlin: De Gautyer.
  9. IFLA (International Federation of Library Association and Institutions). 2020. IFLA Library Reference Model. Un modello concettuale per le informazioni bibliografiche. Edited by IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) Review Grup, Pat Riva, Patrick Le Boeuf, Maja Žumer, italian edition edited by Istituto centrale per il catalogo unico (ICCU). Roma: ICCU.
  10. Moi, Alessandra. 2021. “Da universale a globale. Il controllo bibliografico nel web semantico”. In La trasmissione della conoscenza registrata, a cura di Carlo Bianchini e Lucia Sardo, 369-378. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  11. Vitiello, Giuseppe. (2004). “L’identificazione degli identificatori”. Biblioteche oggi 2: 67-80.
  12. W3C Interest Group. 2008. Cool URI for the semantic web. https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/.

Most read articles by the same author(s)